<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Quantum Cat Analytics &#187; Search Results  &#187;  nanotech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.qcatanalytics.com/?s=nanotech&#038;feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.qcatanalytics.com</link>
	<description>Various aspects of quantum mechanics and nanotechnology ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 02:36:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Nanotechnology Diamondoid vs Bulk Technology Steel</title>
		<link>http://www.qcatanalytics.com/nanotechnology/nanotechnology-diamondoid-vs-bulk-technology-steel</link>
		<comments>http://www.qcatanalytics.com/nanotechnology/nanotechnology-diamondoid-vs-bulk-technology-steel#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 02:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nanotechnology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qcatanalytics.com/?p=19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can the statement be made with a large degree of solid-grounding in what we know about nanotechnology, that once we have self replicating assemblers or some form of large-scale convergent assembly nanotech process, then molecular machine manufacturing will allow us to mass produce diamond and similiar material components/ parts / materials / consumer goods at [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can the statement be made with a large degree of solid-grounding in what we know about nanotechnology, that once we have self replicating assemblers or some form of large-scale convergent assembly nanotech process, then molecular machine manufacturing will allow us to mass produce diamond and similiar material components/ parts / materials / consumer goods at prices that are cheaper than steel based goods produced with traditional bulk processing machines?</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.qcatanalytics.com/nanotechnology/nanotechnology-diamondoid-vs-bulk-technology-steel/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nanotech Dangers</title>
		<link>http://www.qcatanalytics.com/nanotechnology/nanotech-dangers</link>
		<comments>http://www.qcatanalytics.com/nanotechnology/nanotech-dangers#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 02:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanotech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qcatanalytics.com/?p=15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was thinking about the fears people have about nanotechnology. Obviously nanotech has many different ways that it could evolve, and thus potentially posing many dangers. However, the prospects for danger to people from this seems very limited &#8211; in Prey the way people die from the nanobots is by inhalation (and other studies: The [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking about the fears people have about nanotechnology. Obviously nanotech has many different ways that it could evolve, and thus potentially posing many dangers. However, the prospects for danger to people from this seems very limited &#8211; in Prey the way people die from the nanobots is by inhalation (and other studies: The research, led by a group at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration&#8217;s Johnson Space Centre in Houston, has found in preliminary studies that inhaling vast amounts of nanotubes is dangerous. Since they are, in essence, a form of soot, this is not surprising.), and this could all be solved with air filters. But on a more general scale, couldn&#8217;t we simply build (assuming we had skills to construct dangerous nanobots in the first place) a counter-swarm, if you will?</p>
<p>Oh, and how likely to you think the danger of nanobots consuming the biosphere and evolving to basically eat the planet/universe is? I have heard some people in the policy debate circuit (college cross-examination debate) claim that nanotech would destroy the universe through its relentless reproduction.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.qcatanalytics.com/nanotechnology/nanotech-dangers/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
